Dependence of superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3 on quenching conditions
J. A. Schneeloch, R. D. Zhong, Z. J. Xu, G. D. Gu, J. M. Tranquada
arXiv:1504.01360 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.144506 · 2015-04-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Topological superconductivity, implying gapless protected surface states, has recently been proposed to exist in the compound CuxBi2Se3. Unfortunately, low diamagnetic shielding fractions and considerable inhomogeneity have been reported in this compound. In an attempt to understand and improve on the finite superconducting volume fractions, we have investigated the effects of various growth and post-annealing conditions. With a melt-growth (MG) method, diamagnetic shielding fractions of up to 56% in Cu0.3Bi2Se3 have been obtained, the highest value reported for this method. We investigate the efficacy of various quenching and annealing conditions, finding that quenching from temperatures above 560C is essential for superconductivity, whereas quenching from lower temperatures or not quenching at all is detrimental. A modified floating zone (FZ) method yielded large single crystals but little superconductivity. Even after annealing and quenching, FZ-grown samples had much less chance of being superconducting than MG-grown samples. From the low shielding fractions in FZ-grown samples and the quenching dependence, we suggest that a metastable secondary phase having a small volume fraction in most of the samples may be responsible for the superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu0.3Bi2Se3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KxFe2-ySe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuxBi2Se3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuxBi2Se3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Anisotropy of upper critical fields and thermally-activated flux flow of quenched KxFe2-ySe2 single crystals
similarity 0.91Hechang Lei & C. Petrovic · 2011 · arXiv:1110.5316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dependence of superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3 on quenching conditions
similarity 0.90J. A. Schneeloch et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Giant increase in critical current density of KxFe2-ySe2 single crystals
similarity 0.90Hechang Lei & C. Petrovic · 2011 · arXiv:1109.0534
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Evidence for s-Wave Pairing Symmetry in Superconducting CuxBi2Se3 Single Crystals Using a Scanning Tunneling Microscope
similarity 0.90Niv Levy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Visualization of the Nematic Superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3
similarity 0.90Ran Tao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for magnetic-field-induced decoupling of superconducting bilayers in LaCaCuO
similarity 0.89Ruidan Zhong et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.02643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified