← Back to search

Anisotropy of electric resistance and upper critical field in magnetic superconductor Dy$_{0.6}$Y$_{0.4}$Rh$_{3.85}$Ru$_{0.15}$B$_4$

A. V. Terekhov, I. V. Zolochevskii, E. V. Khristenko, L. A. Ishchenko, E. V. Bezuglyi, A. Zaleski, E. P. Khlybov, S. A. Lachenkov

arXiv:1507.03247 · DOI 10.1016/j.physc.2016.02.024 · 2015-07-12 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications

T1theoretical3 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have measured temperature dependencies of the electric resistance $R$ and upper critical magnetic field $H_{c2}$ of a magnetic superconductor Dy$_{0.6}$Y$_{0.4}$Rh$_{3.85}$Ru$_{0.15}$B$_4$. The measurements were made for different angles $\varphi$ of magnetic field inclination to the direction of measuring current and revealed strong anisotropy of the behavior of $R(T)$ and the values of $H_{c2}(T)$. By using the Werthamer-Gelfand-Hohenberg theory, we determined the Maki parameter $α$ and the parameter of the spin-orbital interaction. For $\varphi = 0^\circ$ and $90^\circ$ both parameters are close to zero, thus the magnitude of $H_{c2}(0) \approx 38$ kOe is basically limited by the orbital effect. At $\varphi = 45^\circ$, a large value of the parameter $α= 4.2$ indicates dominating role of the spin-paramagnetic effect in the suppression of $H_{c2}(0)$ down to $8.8$ kOe. We suggest that such behavior of $R(T)$ and $H_{c2}(T)$ is caused by internal magnetism of the Dy atoms which may strongly depend on the magnetic field orientation.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Dy0.6Y0.4Rh3.85Ru0.15B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.66Pressure unresolvedmidpoint
Dy0.6Y0.4Rh3.85Ru0.15B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
Dy0.6Y0.4Rh3.85Ru0.15B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure unresolvedunknown
DyRh4B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.7Pressure not reportedunknown
YRh4B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Dy0.8Y0.2Rh4B4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.9Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers