← Back to search

Superconductivity in Hf$_5$Sb$_3$$_-$$_x$Ru$_x$: Are Ru and Sb a critical charge-transfer pair for superconductivity?

Weiwei Xie, Huixia Luo, Elizabeth M. Seibel, Morten B. Nielsen, Robert J. Cava

arXiv:1508.01233 · DOI 10.1002/CHIN.201538007 · 2015-08-05 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T1theoretical14 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We address the hypothesis that in intermetallic compounds, contrary to a long-standing view that considers electron count and crystal structure type as the only significant chemical criteria for the occurrence of superconductivity, consideration of the actual elements present is a third equally important factor. The importance of chemical identity may seem obvious, especially to chemists, but it has not previously been explicitly tested for intermetallic superconductors. Here we test the hypothesis by searching for and finding a new superconductor in the tetragonal symmetry Hf5Sb3-xMx solid solution. This phase is ideal for this study, because M can be many 3d, 4d and 5d transition metals in an M-Sb chain and is a minor elemental constituent. We find superconductivity for M = Ru only. This is the case even when the electron count can be adjusted to the same value with a different transition element within the same structure type. This leads us to propose that, like Cu-O (cuprate superconductors) and Fe-As (iron-pnictide superconductors) in different classes of compounds, Ru and Sb may be a critical element pair for superconductivity in intermetallic phases.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Hf5Sb3-xRux

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers