Interfacial roughness and proximity effects in superconductor/ferromagnet CuNi/Nb heterostructures
Yu. Khaydukov, R. Morari, O. Soltwedel, T. Keller, G. Christiani, G. Logvenov, M. Kupriyanov, A. Sidorenko, B. Keimer
arXiv:1508.02223 · DOI 10.1063/1.4936789 · 2015-08-10 · arXiv: Strongly Correlated Electrons
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report an investigation of the structural and electronic properties of hybrid superconductor/ferromagnet (S/F) bilayers of composition Nb/Cu$_{60}$Ni$_{40}$ prepared by magnetron sputtering. X-ray and neutron reflectometry show that both the overall interfacial roughness and vertical correlations of the roughness of different interfaces are lower for heterostructures deposited on Al$_2$O$_3$(1$\bar{1}$02) substrates than for those deposited on Si(111). Mutual inductance experiments were then used to study the influence of the interfacial roughness on the superconducting transition temperature, $T_C$. These measurements revealed a $\sim$ 4% higher $T_C$ in heterostructures deposited on Al$_2$O$_3$, compared to those on Si. We attribute this effect to a higher mean-free path of electrons in the S layer, caused by a suppression of diffusive scattering at the interfaces. However, the dependence of the $T_C$ on the thickness of the ferromagnetic layer is not significantly different in the two systems, indicating a weak influence of the interfacial roughness on the transparency for Cooper pairs.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Spectroscopy and critical temperature of diffusive superconducting/ferromagnetic hybrid structures with spin-active interfaces
similarity 0.89Audrey Cottet
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental and theoretical analysis of the upper critical field in FSF trilayers
similarity 0.89E. Antropov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1302.0644
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Substrate induced proximity effect in superconducting niobium nanofilms
similarity 0.88S. J. Rezvani et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.12643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Peculiarities of superconducting properties of thin superconductor-normal metal bilayer with large ratio of resistivities
similarity 0.88D. Yu. Vodolazov et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.01169
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface versus bulk superconductivity in NbN thin films under magnetic fields
similarity 0.88Mikhail Belogolovskii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dimensional crossover and incipient quantum size effects in superconducting niobium nanofilms
similarity 0.87N. Pinto et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.00265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified