Shaping a superconducting dome: Enhanced Cooper-pairing versus suppressed phase coherence in coupled aluminum nanograins
Uwe S. Pracht, Nimrod Bachar, Lara Benfatto, Guy Deutscher, Eli Farber, Martin Dressel, Marc Scheffler
arXiv:1508.04270 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.100503 · 2015-08-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Deterministic enhancement of the superconducting (SC) critical temperature $T_c$ is a long-standing goal in material science. One strategy is engineering a material at the nanometer scale such that quantum confinement strengthens the electron pairing, thus increasing the superconducting energy gap $Δ$, as was observed for individual nanoparticles. A true phase-coherent SC condensate, however, can exist only on larger scales and requires a finite phase stiffness $J$. In the case of coupled aluminium (Al) nanograins, $T_c$ can exceed that of bulk Al by a factor of three, but despite several proposals the relevant mechanism at play is not yet understood. Here we use optical spectroscopy on granular Al to disentangle the evolution of the fundamental SC energy scales, $Δ$ and $J$, as a function of grain coupling. Starting from well-coupled arrays, $Δ$ grows with progressive grain decoupling, causing the increasing of $T_c$. As the grain-coupling is further suppressed, $Δ$ saturates while $T_c$ decreases, concomitantly with a sharp decline of $J$. This crossover to a phase-driven SC transition is accompanied by an optical gap persisting above $T_c$. These findings identify granular Al as an ideal playground to test the basic mechanisms that enhance superconductivity by nano-inhomogeneity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Enhanced Cooper pairing versus suppressed phase coherence shaping the superconducting dome in coupled aluminum nanograins
similarity 0.93Uwe S. Pracht et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamics of granular aluminum from superconductor to insulator: observation of collective superconducting modes
similarity 0.88F. Levy-Bertrand et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.05843
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect beyond the coherence critical field of a nanoscale granular superconductor
similarity 0.87S. Lerer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
An inhomogeneous Josephson phase in thin-film and High-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.87Y. Imry et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0709.2321
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comparative analysis of tunneling magnetoresistance in low- Nb/AlAlOx/Nb and high- BiPbSrCaCuO intrinsic Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87V. M. Krasnov et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1105.1281
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasi-Particle Dynamics in Superconducting Aluminum
similarity 0.87Katrin Steinberg et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.3391
Source status unknown — claims are unverified