Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the customary mode of operation of a SQUID, the electromagnetic field in the SQUID is an oscillatory function of time. In this situation, electromagnetic radiation is emitted, and couples to the sample. This is a back-action that can alter the state that we intend to measure. A circuit that could perform as a stationary SQUID consists of a loop of superconducting material that encloses the magnetic flux, connected to a superconducting and to a normal electrode. This circuit does not contain Josephson junctions, or any other miniature feature. We study the evolution of the order parameter and of the electrochemical potential in this circuit; they converge to a stationary regime and the voltage between the electrodes depends on the enclosed flux. We obtain expressions for the power dissipation and for the heat transported by the electric current; the validity of these expressions does not rely on a particular evolution model for the order parameter. We evaluate the influence of fluctuations. For a SQUID perimeter of the order of 1$μ$m and temperature $0.9T_c$, we obtain a flux resolution of the order of $10^{-5}Φ_0/$Hz$^{1/2}$; the resolution is expected to improve as the temperature is lowered.
Similar papers
Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier
similarity 0.91M. Hatridge et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.2466
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum state engineering with Josephson-junction devices
similarity 0.91Yuriy Makhlin et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0011269
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced superconducting circuits and devices
similarity 0.90Martin Weides & Hannes Rotzinger · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Engineering decoherence in Josephson persistent-current qubits
similarity 0.90Caspar H. van der Wal et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211664
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hybrid superconducting quantum magnetometer
similarity 0.89F. Giazotto & F. Taddei · 2011 · arXiv:1103.3598
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Superconducting Quantum Interference Proximity Transistor (SQUIPT)
similarity 0.89F. Giazotto · 2013 · arXiv:1310.2884
Source status unknown — claims are unverified