Comparing and combining measurement-based and driven-dissipative entanglement stabilization
Yehan Liu, Shyam Shankar, Nissim Ofek, Michael Hatridge, Anirudh Narla, Katrina Sliwa, Luigi Frunzio, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Michel H. Devoret
arXiv:1509.00860 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.011022 · 2015-09-02 · arXiv: Quantum Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate and contrast two approaches to the stabilization of qubit entanglement by feedback. Our demonstration is built on a feedback platform consisting of two superconducting qubits coupled to a cavity which are measured by a nearly-quantum-limited measurement chain and controlled by high-speed classical logic circuits. This platform is used to stabilize entanglement by two nominally distinct schemes: a "passive" reservoir engineering method and an "active" correction based on conditional parity measurements. In view of the instrumental roles that these two feedback paradigms play in quantum error-correction and quantum control, we directly compare them on the same experimental setup. Further, we show that a second layer of feedback can be added to each of these schemes, which heralds the presence of a high-fidelity entangled state in realtime. This "nested" feedback brings about a marked entanglement fidelity improvement without sacrificing success probability.
Similar papers
Dissipation-induced continuous quantum error correction for superconducting circuits
similarity 0.87Joachim Cohen & Mazyar Mirrahimi · 2014 · arXiv:1409.6759
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficient steady state entanglement generation in strongly driven coupled qubits
similarity 0.86Ana Laura Gramajo et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.12960
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal set of scalable dynamically corrected gates for quantum error correction with always-on qubit couplings
similarity 0.86Amrit De & Leonid P. Pryadko · 2012 · arXiv:1209.2764
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizing a Bell state of two superconducting qubits by dissipation engineering
similarity 0.86Z. Leghtas et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hardware-efficient stabilization of entanglement via engineered dissipation in superconducting circuits
similarity 0.86Changling Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizing Entanglement via Symmetry-Selective Bath Engineering in Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.86M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified