Quantum Hydrogen-Bond Symmetrization and High-Temperature Superconductivity in Hydrogen Sulfide
Ion Errea, Matteo Calandra, Chris J. Pickard, Joseph Nelson, Richard J. Needs, Yinwei Li, Hanyu Liu, Yunwei Zhang, Yanming Ma, Francesco Mauri
arXiv:1512.02933 · DOI 10.1038/nature17175 · 2015-12-09 · Nature
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Hydrogen compounds are peculiar as the quantum nature of the proton can crucially affect their structural and physical properties. A remarkable example are the high-pressure phases of H$_2$O, where quantum proton fluctuations favor the symmetrization of the H bond and lower by 30 GPa the boundary between the asymmetric structure and the symmetric one. Here we show that an analogous quantum symmetrization occurs in the recently discovered sulfur hydride superconductor with the record superconducting critical temperature $T_c=203$ K at 155 GPa. In this system, according to classical theory, superconductivity occurs via formation of a structure of stoichiometry H$_3$S with S atoms arranged on a body-centered-cubic (bcc) lattice. For $P \gtrsim 175$ GPa, the H atoms are predicted to sit midway between two S atoms, in a structure with $Im\bar3m$ symmetry. At lower pressures the H atoms move to an off-center position forming a short H$-$S covalent bond and a longer H$\cdots$S hydrogen bond, in a structure with $R3m$ symmetry. X-ray diffraction experiments confirmed the H$_3$S stoichiometry and the S lattice sites, but were unable to discriminate between the two phases. Our present ab initio density-functional theory (DFT) calculations show that the quantum nuclear motion lowers the symmetrization pressure by 72 GPa. Consequently, we predict that the $Im\bar3m$ phase is stable over the whole pressure range within which a high $T_c$ was measured. The observed pressure-dependence of $T_c$ is closely reproduced in our calculations for the $Im\bar3m$ phase, but not for the $R3m$ phase. Thus, the quantum nature of the proton completely rules the superconducting phase diagram of H$_3$S.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 203 | 155 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Quantitative analysis of nonadiabatic effects in dense HS and PH superconductors
similarity 0.91Artur P. Durajski · 2017 · arXiv:1707.00941
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonadiabatic and anharmonic effects in high-pressure H3S and D3S superconductors
similarity 0.88Shashi B. Mishra & Elena R. Margine · 2025 · arXiv:2510.25902
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full-bandwidth anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory and its application to superhydrides
similarity 0.88Roman Lucrezi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.00056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectral Properties and Quantum Phase Transitions in Superconducting Junctions with a Ferromagnetic Link
similarity 0.88Mikel Rouco et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.01977
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extrinsic Spin-Charge Coupling in Diffusive Superconducting Systems
similarity 0.88Chunli Huang et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.07029
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in CH4 and BH4- Containing Compounds Derived from the High-Pressure Superhydrides
similarity 0.87Nisha Geng et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2401.00088
Source status unknown — claims are unverified