The application of the fractional exclusion statistics to the BCS theory--a redefinition of the quasiparticle energies
Dragos-Victor Anghel, George Alexandru Nemnes
arXiv:1512.08703 · DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2016.04.021 · 2015-12-29 · Physica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The effective energy of a superconductor $E_{eff}(T)$ at temperature $T$ is defined as the difference between the total energy at temperature $T$ and the total energy at 0~K. We call the energy of the condensate, ${\mathcal E}_c$, the difference between $E_{eff}$ and the sum of the quasiparticle energies $E_{qp}$. ${\mathcal E}_c$, $E_{qp}$, as well as the BCS quasiparticle energy $ε$ are positive and depend on the gap energy $Δ$, which, in turn, depends on the populations of the quasiparticle states (equivalently, they depend on $T$). So from the energy point of view the superconductor is a Fermi liquid of non-ideal quasiparticles. We show that the choice of quasiparticles is not unique, but there is an infinite range of possibilities. Some of these possibilities have been explored in the context of the fractional exclusion statistics (FES), which is a general method of describing interacting particle systems as ideal gases. We apply FES here and transform the Fermi liquid of BCS excitations into an ideal gas by redefining the quasiparticle energies. The new FES quasiparticles exhibit the same energy gap as the BCS quasiparticles, but a different DOS, which is finite at any quasiparticle energy. We also discuss the effect of the remnant electron-electron interaction (electron-electron interaction beyond the BCS pairing model) and show that this can stabilize the BCS condensate, increasing the critical temperature.
Similar papers
Squeezed-field path-integral description of BCS superconductors
similarity 0.90Kazuma Nagao et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.12348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS-BEC crossover in quantum confined superconductors
similarity 0.89Andrea Guidini et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.06759
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS models of Josephson qubits I. Energy spectra
similarity 0.89Alicki, R. & Miklaszewski, W. · 2010 · arXiv:1012.0140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Using materials for quasiparticle engineering
similarity 0.89Gianluigi Catelani & Jukka P. Pekola · 2021 · arXiv:2107.09695
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fundamental limits of superconducting quantum computers
similarity 0.88Michele Vischi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.05114
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Post-quench gap dynamics of two-band superconductors
similarity 0.88Tianbai Cui et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.06125
Source status unknown — claims are unverified