Role of the Ward Identity and Relevance of the G0W0 Approximation in Normal and Superconducting States
Yasutami Takada
arXiv:1601.02364 · DOI 10.1080/00268976.2015.1131860 · 2016-01-11 · Molecular Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
On the basis of the self-consistent calculation scheme for the electron self-energy with the use of the three-point vertex function always satisfying the Ward identity, we find that the obtained quasiparticle dispersion in the normal state in gapped systems such as semiconductors, insulators, and molecules is well reproduced by that in the one-shot GW (or G0W0) approximation. In calculating the superconducting transition temperature Tc, we also find a similar situation; the result for Tc in the gauge-invariant self-consistent (GISC) framework including the effect of the vertex corrections satisfying the Ward identity is different from that in the conventional Eliashberg theory (which amounts to the GW approximation for superconductivity) but is close to that in the G0W0 approximation. Those facts indicate that the G0W0 approximation actually takes proper account of both vertex and high-order self-energy corrections in a mutually cancelling manner and thus we can understand that the G0W0 approximation is better than the fully self-consistent GW one in obtaining some of physical quantities.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Revisiting the homogeneous electron gas in pursuit of the properly normed ab initio Eliashberg theory
similarity 0.88Ryosuke Akashi · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05751
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Ferromagnetic Spin Correlations on Superconductivity in Ferromagnetic Metals
similarity 0.87K. B. Blagoev et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9812171
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Collective Excitations in High-Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.87M. I. Salkola & J. R. Schrieffer · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9712255
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conventional and practical metallic superconductivity arising from repulsive Coulomb coupling
similarity 0.87Sankar Das Sarma et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2511.00625
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS-BEC Crossover: From High Temperature Superconductors to Ultracold Superfluids
similarity 0.86Qijin Chen et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404274
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Asymptotically Exact Solution for Superconductivity near Ferromagnetic Criticality
similarity 0.86Satoshi Fujimoto · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401412
Source status unknown — claims are unverified