Differences in chemical doping matter - Superconductivity in Ti1-xTaxSe2 but not in Ti1-xNbxSe2
Huixia Luo, Weiwei Xie, Jing Tao, Ivo Pletikosic, Tonica Valla, Girija S. Sahasrabudhe, Gavin Osterhoudt, Erin Sutton, Kenneth S. Burch, Elizabeth M. Seibel, Jason W. Krizan, Yimei Zhu, Robert J. Cava
arXiv:1601.08226 · DOI 10.1021/ACS.CHEMMATER.6B00288 · 2016-01-29 · Chemistry of Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report that 1T-TiSe2, an archetypical layered transition metal dichalcogenide, becomes superconducting when Ta is substituted for Ti but not when Nb is substituted for Ti. This is unexpected because Nb and Ta should be chemically equivalent electron donors. Superconductivity emerges near x = 0.02 for Ti1-xTaxSe2, while for Ti1-xNbxSe2, no superconducting transitions are observed above 0.4 K. The equivalent chemical nature of the dopants is confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. ARPES and Raman scattering studies show similarities and differences between the two systems, but the fundamental reasons why the Nb and Ta dopants yield such different behavior are unknown. We present a comparison of the electronic phase diagrams of many electron-doped 1T-TiSe2 systems, showing that they behave quite differently, which may have broad implications in the search for new superconductors. We propose that superconducting Ti0.8Ta0.2Se2 will be suitable for devices and other studies based on exfoliated crystal flakes.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti1-xTaxSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Ti0.8Ta0.2Se2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Ti1-xNbxSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Theory for doping trends in titanium oxypnictide superconductors
similarity 0.87Han-Xiang Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Significant enhancement of compositional and superconducting homogeneity in Ti rather than Ta-doped Nb3Sn
similarity 0.87C. Tarantini et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.07590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Substitution of Ni for Fe in superconducting FeTeSe depresses the normal-state conductivity but not the magnetic spectral weight
similarity 0.86Jinghui Wang et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1501.01114
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High pressure study of the normal and superconducting states of the layered pnictide oxide BaNaTiSbO with x = 0, 0.10, and 0.15
similarity 0.86M. Gooch et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.5930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity induced by electron doping in La1−xMxOBiS2 (M= Ti, Zr, Hf, Th)
similarity 0.86D. Yazici et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in electron-doped layered TiNCl with variable interlayer coupling
similarity 0.86Shuai Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified