Surface Nematic Order in Iron Pnictides
Kok Wee Song, Alexei E. Koshelev
arXiv:1604.07757 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094509 · 2016-04-26 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Electronic nematicity plays important role in iron-based superconductors. These materials have layered structure and theoretical description of their magnetic and nematic transitions has been well established in two-dimensional approximation, i.e., when the layers can be treated independently. However, the interaction between iron layers mediated by electron tunneling may cause non-trivial three-dimensional behavior. Starting from the simplest model for orbital nematic in a single layer, we investigate the influence of interlayer tunneling on bulk nematic order and possible preemptive state where this order is only formed near the surface. We found that the interlayer tunneling suppresses the bulk nematicity which makes favorable formation of a surface nematic above the bulk transition temperature. The purely electronic tunneling Hamiltonian, however, favors alternating from layer-to-layer nematic order parameter in the bulk. The uniform bulk state typically observed experimentally may be stabilized by the coupling with the elastic lattice deformation. Depending on strength of this coupling, we found three regimes: (i) surface nematic and alternating bulk order, (ii) surface nematic and uniform bulk order, and (iii) uniform bulk order without the intermediate surface phase. The intermediate surface-nematic state may resolve the current controversy about the existence of the weak "meta-nematic transition" in the compound BaFe$_2$As$_{2-x}$P$_{x}$.
Similar papers
Quantum critical point lying beneath the superconducting dome in iron-pnictides
similarity 0.90T. Shibauchi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.6387
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Energy dependence of the spin excitation anisotropy in uniaxial-strained BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2
similarity 0.89Yu Song et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.02759
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-Based Superconductors: A Decade of Materials, Magnetism, and Mechanisms
similarity 0.89Xingye Lu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.11355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the origin of non-monotonic doping dependence of the in-plane resistivity anisotropy in Ba(Fe)As, = Co, Ni and Cu
similarity 0.89Hsueh-Hui Kuo et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1103.4535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematic and meta-nematic transitions in the iron pnictides
similarity 0.89S. Kasahara et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1207.1045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripes, spin resonance and pairing symmetry in FeSe-based layered superconductors
similarity 0.89Tanmoy Das & A. V. Balatsky · 2011 · arXiv:1101.6056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified