← Back to search

Electron doping evolution of the neutron spin resonance in NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$As

Chenglin Zhang, Weicheng Lv, Guotai Tan, Yu Song, Scott V. Carr, Songxue Chi, M. Matsuda, A. D. Christianson, J. A. Fernandez-Baca, L. W. Harriger, Pengcheng Dai

arXiv:1605.06890 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174522 · 2016-05-23 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical9 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Neutron spin resonance, a collective magnetic excitation coupled to superconductivity, is one of the most prominent features shared by a broad family of unconventional superconductors including copper oxides, iron pnictides, and heavy fermions. In this work, we study the doping evolution of the resonances in NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$As covering the entire superconducting dome. For the underdoped compositions, two resonance modes coexist. As doping increases, the low-energy resonance gradually loses its spectral weight to the high-energy one but remains at the same energy. By contrast, in the overdoped regime we only find one single resonance, which acquires a broader width in both energy and momentum, but retains approximately the same peak position even when $T_c$ drops by nearly a half compared to optimal doping. These results suggest that the energy of the resonance in electron overdoped NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$As is neither simply proportional to $T_c$ nor the superconducting gap, but is controlled by the multi-orbital character of the system and doped impurity scattering effect.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NaFe0.988Co0.012As

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

11Pressure not reportedunknown
NaFe0.975Co0.025As

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

22Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers