Probing chiral superconductivity in Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$ underneath the surface by point contact measurements
He Wang, Jiawei Luo, Weijian Lou, Jian Wei, J. E. Ortmann, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Liu
arXiv:1605.07712 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/aa65c5 · 2016-05-25 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$ (SRO) is the prime candidate for chiral $p$-wave superconductor with critical temperature $T_{c}(SRO)\sim$1.5 K. Chiral domains with opposite chiralities $p_{x}\pm ip_{y}$ were proposed, but yet to be confirmed. We measure the field dependence of the point contact (PC) resistance between a tungsten tip and the SRO-Ru eutectic crystal, where micrometer-sized Ru inclusions are embedded in SRO with atomic sharp interface. Ruthenium is an $s$-wave superconductor with $T_{c}(Ru)\sim$0.5 K, flux pinned near the Ru inclusions can suppress its superconductivity as reflected from the PC resistance and spectra. This flux pinning effect is originated from SRO \textit{underneath} the surface and is very strong. To fully remove it, one has to thermal cycle the sample above $T_{c}(SRO)$. This resembles the thermal demagnetization for a ferromagnet, where ferromagnetic domains are randomized above its Curie temperature. Another way is by applying alternating fields with decreasing amplitude, resembling field demagnetization for the ferromagnet. The observed hysteresis in magnetoresistance can be explained by domain dynamics, providing support for the existence of chiral domains. The origin of strong pinning \textit{underneath} the surface is also discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ru Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Lattices of double-quanta vortices and chirality inversion in superconductors
similarity 0.92Julien Garaud et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.03946
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frequency and temperature dependence of the anomalous Hall conductivity in a chiral px+ipy superconductor with impurities
similarity 0.90Roman M. Lutchyn et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0905.3918
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-induced p-wave Superconductivity in Mesoscopic Systems
similarity 0.90Jia-Wei Huo et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1108.2380
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is Sr2RuO4 a Chiral P-Wave Superconductor?
similarity 0.90C. Kallin & A. J. Berlinsky · 2009 · arXiv:0902.2170
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Site-selective NMR for odd-frequency Cooper pairs around vortex in chiral p-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90Kenta K. Tanaka et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.00558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Upper limit on spontaneous supercurrents in SrRuO
similarity 0.89J. R. Kirtley et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0704.3364
Source status unknown — claims are unverified