← Back to search

Evidence for strong lattice effects as revealed from huge unconventional oxygen isotope effects on the pseudogap temperature in La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$

M. Bendele, F. von Rohr, Z. Guguchia, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, A. Bianconi, A. Simon, A. Bussmann-Holder, H. Keller

arXiv:1606.04251 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014514 · 2016-06-14 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical32 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The oxygen isotope ($^{16}$O/$^{18}$O) effect (OIE) on the pseudogap (charge-stripe ordering) temperature $T^{\ast}$ is investigated for the cuprate superconductor La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ as a function of doping $x$ by means of x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) studies. A strong $x$ dependent and sign reversed OIE on $T^{\ast}$ is observed. The OIE exponent $α_{T^{\ast}}$ systematically decreases from $α_{T^{\ast}} = - 0.6(1.3)$ for $x = 0.15$ to $α_{T^{\ast}} = - 4.4(1.1)$ for $x = 0.06$, corresponding to increasing $T^{\ast}$ and decreasing superconducting transition temperature $T_{c}$. Both $T^{\ast}(^{16}{\rm O})$ and $T^{\ast}(^{18}{\rm O})$ exhibit a linear doping dependence with different slopes and critical end points (where $T^{\ast}(^{16}{\rm O})$ and $T^{\ast}(^{18}{\rm O})$ fall to zero) at $x_{c}(^{16}{\rm O}) = 0.201(4)$ and $x_{c}(^{18}{\rm O}) = 0.182(3)$, indicating a large positive OIE of $x_{c}$ with an exponent of $α_{x_{c}} = 0.84(22)$. The remarkably large and strongly doping dependent OIE on $T^{\ast}$ signals a substantial involvement of the lattice in the formation of the pseudogap, consistent with a polaronic approach to cuprate superconductivity and the vibronic character of its ground state.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.91Sr0.09CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers