Superconducting electron and hole lenses
Hosein Cheraghchi, Hanieh Esmailzadeh, Ali G. Moghaddam
arXiv:1606.06892 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214508 · 2016-06-22 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We show how a superconducting region (S) sandwiched between two normal leads (N), in the presence of barriers, can act as a lens for propagating electron and hole waves by virtue of the so- called crossed Andreev reflection (CAR). The CAR process which is equivalent to the Cooper pair splitting into the two N electrodes provides a unique possibility of constructing entangled electrons in solid state systems. When electrons are locally injected from an N lead, due to the CAR and normal reflection of quasiparticles by the insulating barriers at the interfaces, sequences of electron and hole focuses are established inside another N electrode. This behavior originates from the change of momentum during electron-hole conversion beside the successive normal reflections of electrons and holes due to the barriers. The focusing phenomena studied here is fundamentally different from the electron focusing in other systems like graphene pn junctions. In particular due to the electron-hole symmetry of superconducting state, the focusing of electrons and holes are robust against thermal excitations. Furthermore the effect of superconducting layer width, the injection point position, and barriers strength is investigated on the focusing behavior of the junction. Very intriguingly, it is shown that by varying the barriers strength, one can separately control the density of electrons or holes at the focuses.
Similar papers
Crossed Andreev reflection in diffusive contacts
similarity 0.93A. Brinkman & A. A. Golubov · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611144
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrically controlled crossed Andreev reflection in two-dimensional antiferromagnets
similarity 0.93Martin F. Jakobsen et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.07345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cross-correlated shot noise in three-terminal superconducting hybrid nanostructures
similarity 0.93Dmitry S. Golubev & Andrei D. Zaikin · 2019 · arXiv:1902.05476
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection in superconducting graphene spin-valves: Spin-switch effect
similarity 0.93Jacob Linder et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0906.3738
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection in topological insulator nanowire T-junctions
similarity 0.92Jacob Fuchs et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2011.01265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrical control of crossed Andreev reflection and spin-valley switch in antiferromagnet/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.92Wei-Tao Lu & Qing-Feng Sun · 2025 · arXiv:2509.04003
Source status unknown — claims are unverified