Andreev and Majorana bound states in single and double quantum dot structures
Joelson F. Silva, E. Vernek
arXiv:1607.05219 · DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/28/43/435702 · 2016-07-18 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a numerical study of the emergence of Majorana and Andreev bound states in a system composed by two quantum dots, in which one of then is coupled to a conventional superconductor, SC1, and the other connects to a topological superconductor, SC2. By controlling the interdot coupling we can drive the system from a two single (uncoupled) quantum dots to a double (coupled) dot system configurations. We employ a recursive Green's function technique that provides us with numerically exact results for the local density of states of the system. We first show that in the uncoupled dot configuration (single dot behavior) the Majorana and the Andreev bound states appear in an individual dot in two completely distinct regimes. Therefore, they cannot coexist in the single quantum dot system. We then study the coexistence of these states in the coupled double-dot configuration. In this situation we show that in the trivial phase of the SC2, the Andreev states are bound to an individual quantum dot in the atomic regime (weak interdot coupling) or extended over the entire molecule in the molecular regime (strong interdot coupling). More interesting features is actually seen in the topological phase of the SC2. In this case, in the atomic limit, the Andreev states appear bound to one of the quantum dots while a Majorana zero mode appears in the other one. In the molecular regime, on the other hand, the Andreev bound states take over the entire molecule while the Majorana state remains always bound to one of the quantum dots.
Similar papers
Many-body perturbation theory for the superconducting quantum dot: Fundamental role of the magnetic field
similarity 0.92Václav Janiš & Jiawei Yan · 2021 · arXiv:2102.13035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
pi-Junction behavior and Andreev bound states in Kondo quantum dots with superconducting leads
similarity 0.90Gabriel Sellier et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0504649
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between direct and crossed Andreev reflections in hybrid nanostructures
similarity 0.90Grzegorz Michałek et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowires
similarity 0.90Elsa Prada et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.04512
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of spin-orbit interaction and Andreev reflection in proximized quantum dots
similarity 0.90Bogdan R. Bułka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magneto-electric spectroscopy of Andreev bound states in Josephson quantum dots
similarity 0.90Nils Wentzell et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.09313
Source status unknown — claims are unverified