Analytical derivation of DC SQUID response
I. I. Soloviev, N. V. Klenov, A. E. Schegolev, S. V. Bakurskiy, M. Yu. Kupriyanov
arXiv:1608.02325 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/29/9/094005 · 2016-08-08 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider voltage and current responses formation in DC SQUID with overdamped Josephson junctions in resistive and superconducting state in the frame of resistively shunted junction (RSJ) model. For simplicity we neglect the junction capacitance and the noise effect. Explicit expressions for the responses in resistive state were obtained for a SQUID which is symmetrical with respect to bias current injection point. Normalized SQUID inductance $l = 2 e I_c L/\hbar$ (where $I_c$ is the critical current of Josephson junction, $L$ is the SQUID inductance, $e$ is the electron charge and $\hbar$ is the Planck constant) was assumed to be within the range $l \leq 1$, subsequently expanded up to $l \approx 7$ using two fitting parameters. SQUID current response in superconducting state was considered for arbitrary value of the inductance. Impact of small technological spread of parameters relevant for low-temperature superconductor (LTS) technology was studied with generalization of the developed analytical approach for a case of small difference of critical currents and shunt resistances of the Josephson junctions, and inequality of SQUID inductive shoulders for both resistive and superconducting states. Comparison with numerical calculation results shows that developed analytical expressions can be used in practical LTS SQUIDs and SQUID-based circuits design, e.g. large serial SQIF, drastically decreasing the time of simulation.
Similar papers
Dynamical effects of an unconventional current-phase relation in YBCO dc-SQUIDs
similarity 0.89T. Lindstrom et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0303144
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kinetic inductance and voltage response dependence on temperature: Asymmetric dc SQUID case study
similarity 0.88M. A. Gali Labarias et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.01505
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-4e supercurrent in a two-dimensional InAs-Al superconductor-semiconductor heterostructure
similarity 0.88Carlo Ciaccia et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.05467
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Negative-resistance models for parametrically flux-pumped superconducting quantum interference devices
similarity 0.88K. M. Sundqvist & P. Delsing · 2013 · arXiv:1311.2063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Voltage-Current Characteristic of high T_c DC SQUID: theory, simulation, experiment
similarity 0.88Ya. S. Greenberg & I. L. Novikov · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507537
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave-Tunable Diode Effect in Asymmetric SQUIDs with Topological Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.88Joseph J. Cuozzo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.16931
Source status unknown — claims are unverified