Superconductivity and fluctuation in Ba$_{1-p}$K$_p$Fe$_2$As$_2$ and Ba(Fe$_{1-n}$Co$_n$)$_2$As$_2$
T. Böhm, R. Hosseinian Ahangharnejhad, D. Jost, A. Baum, B. Muschler, F. Kretzschmar, P. Adelmann, T. Wolf, H. -H. Wen, J. -H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, R. Hackl
arXiv:1608.02772 · DOI 10.1002/pssb.201600308 · 2016-08-09 · physica status solidi (b)
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the interplay of fluctuations and superconductivity in BaFe$_2$As$_2$ (Ba-122) compounds with Ba and Fe substituted by K ($p$ doping) and Co ($n$ doping), respectively. To this end we measured electronic Raman spectra as a function of polarisation and temperature. We observe gap excitations and fluctuations for all doping levels studied. The response from fluctuations is much stronger for Co substitution and, according to the selection rules and the temperature dependence, originates from the exchange of two critical spin fluctuations with characteristic wave vectors $(\pmπ, 0)$ and $(0,\pmπ)$. At 22\% K doping ($p=0.22$), we find the same selection rules and spectral shape for the fluctuations but the intensity is smaller by a factor of 5. Since there exists no nematic region above the orthorhombic spin-density-wave (SDW) phase the identification of the fluctuations via the temperature dependence is not possible. The gap excitations in the superconducting state indicate strongly anisotropic near-nodal gaps for Co substitution which make the observation of collective modes difficult. The variation with doping of the spectral weights of the $A_{1g}$ and $B_{1g}$ gap features does not support the influence of fluctuations on Cooper pairing. Therefore, the observation of Bardasis-Schrieffer modes inside the nearly clean gaps on the K-doped side remains the only experimental evidence for the relevance of fluctuations for pairing.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba0.78K0.22Fe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ba(Fe1-nCon)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Structural and antiferromagnetic properties of Ba(FeCoRh)As compounds
similarity 0.90M. G. Kim et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.02974
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between superconductivity and magnetic/nematic order as a source of anisotropic superconducting gap in underdoped BaKFeAs
similarity 0.90H. Kim et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.2369
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and electronic fluctuations in BaKFeAs studied by Raman scattering
similarity 0.90S. -F. Wu et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.06064
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Band and momentum dependent electron dynamics in superconducting as seen via electronic Raman scattering
similarity 0.90B. Muschler et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.0898
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic nematic susceptibility of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Anna E. Böhmer & Christoph Meingast · 2015 · arXiv:1505.05120
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-doping dependence of the anisotropic superconductivity in BaFeNiAs
similarity 0.90Zhaosheng Wang et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.06660
Source status unknown — claims are unverified