Optical observation of spin-density-wave fluctuations in Ba122 iron-based superconductors
B. Xu, Y. M. Dai, H. Xiao, B. Shen, Z. R. Ye, A. Forget, D. Colson, D. L. Feng, H. H. Wen, X. G. Qiu, R. P. S. M. Lobo
arXiv:1608.05474 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085147 · 2016-08-19 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In iron-based superconductors, a spin-density-wave (SDW) magnetic order is suppressed with doping and unconventional superconductivity appears in close proximity to the SDW instability. The optical response of the SDW order shows clear gap features: substantial suppression in the low-frequency optical conductivity, alongside a spectral weight transfer from low to high frequencies. Here, we study the detailed temperature dependence of the optical response in three different series of the Ba122 system [Ba$_{1-x}$K$_{x}$Fe$_{2}$As$_{2}$, Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$ and BaFe$_{2}$(As$_{1-x}$P$_{x}$)$_{2}$]. Intriguingly, we found that the suppression of the low-frequency optical conductivity and spectral weight transfer appear at a temperature $T^{\ast}$ much higher than the SDW transition temperature $T_{SDW}$. Since this behavior has the same optical feature and energy scale as the SDW order, we attribute it to SDW fluctuations. Furthermore, $T^{\ast}$ is suppressed with doping, closely following the doping dependence of the nematic fluctuations detected by other techniques. These results suggest that the magnetic and nematic orders have an intimate relationship, in favor of the magnetic-fluctuation-driven nematicity scenario in iron-based superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba1-xKxFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ba1-xKxFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Transport properties, upper critical field and anisotropy of Ba(FeRu)As single crystals
similarity 0.87Jie Xing et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.6793
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal-state charge dynamics in doped BaFe2As2: Roles of doping and necessary ingredients for superconductivity
similarity 0.86M. Nakajima et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.6133
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagram and physical properties of NaFeCuAs single crystals
similarity 0.86A. F. Wang et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1307.6121
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity at 23 K in Pt doped BaFe2As2 single crystals
similarity 0.86S. R. Saha et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.2752
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical conductivity of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.86Aliaksei Charnukha · 2014 · arXiv:1406.1879
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel Superconducting Phases in Copper Oxides and Iron-oxypnictides: NMR Studies
similarity 0.85Yoshio Kitaoka et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.3928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified