← Back to search

Strong pinning of vortices by antiferromagnetic domain boundaries in CeCo(In$_{1-x}$Cd$_x$)$_5$

Dong-Jin Jang, Luis Pedrero, L. D. Pham, Z. Fisk, Manuel Brando

arXiv:1609.01164 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093031 · 2016-09-05 · New Journal of Physics

T1theoretical2 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have studied the isothermal magnetization $M(H)$ of CeCo(In$_{1-x}$Cd$_x$)$_5$ with $x$ = 0.0075 and 0.01 down to 50 mK. Pronounced field-history dependent phenomena occur in the coexistence regime of the superconducting and antiferromagnetic phases. At low-fields, a phenomenological model of magnetic-flux entry well explains $M(H)$ implying the dominance of bulk pinning effect. However, unless crystallographic quenched disorder is hysteretic, the asymmetric peak effect (ASPE) which appears at higher fields cannot be explained by the pinning of vortices due to material defects. Also the temperature dependence of the ASPE deviates from the conventional scenario for the peak effect. Comparison of our thermodynamic phase diagrams with those from previous neutron scattering and magnetoresistance experiments indicates that the pinning of vortices takes place at the field-history dependent antiferromagnetic domain boundaries.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CeCo(In0.9925Cd0.0075)5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
CeCo(In0.99Cd0.01)5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers