Structure of the pairing gap from orbital nematic fluctuations
Tomoaki Agatsuma, Hiroyuki Yamase
arXiv:1609.02861 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.214505 · 2016-09-09 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study superconducting instability from orbital nematic fluctuations in a minimal model consisting of the $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ orbitals, and choose model parameters which capture the typical Fermi surface geometry observed in iron-based superconductors. We solve the Eliashberg equations down to low temperatures with keeping the renormalization function and a full momentum dependence of the pairing gap. When superconductivity occurs in the tetragonal phase, we find that the pairing gap exhibits a weak momentum dependence over the Fermi surfaces. The superconducting instability occurs also inside the nematic phase. When the $d_{xz}$ orbital is occupied more than the $d_{yz}$ orbital in the nematic phase, a larger (smaller) gap is realized on the Fermi-surface parts, where the $d_{xz}$ ($d_{yz}$) orbital component is dominant, leading to a substantial momentum dependence of the pairing gap on the hole Fermi surfaces. On the other hand, the momentum dependence of the gap is weak on the electron Fermi surfaces. We also find that while the leading instability is the so-called $s_{++}$-wave symmetry, the second leading one is $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave symmetry. In particular, these two states are nearly degenerate in the tetragonal phase whereas such quasi-degeneracy is lifted in the nematic phase and the $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave symmetry changes to highly anisotropic $s$-wave symmetry.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 65 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting gap structure of FeSe
similarity 0.92Lin Jiao et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.01908
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Highly anisotropic and two-fold symmetric superconducting gap in nematically ordered FeSeS
similarity 0.92H. C. Xu et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.05219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudospin-Triplet Pairing in Iron-Chalcogenide Superconductors
similarity 0.92Meng Zeng et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.06039
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Separate tuning of nematicity and spin fluctuations to unravel the origin of superconductivity in FeSe
similarity 0.92Seung-Ho Baek et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.02079
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity around nematic quantum critical point in two-dimensional metals
similarity 0.91Guo-Zhu Liu & Jing-Rong Wang · 2017 · arXiv:1706.02583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematicity and superconductivity: Competition versus cooperation
similarity 0.91Xiao Chen et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2004.13134
Source status unknown — claims are unverified