← Back to search

Thermodynamic parameters of single- or multi-band superconductors derived from self-field critical currents

Evgeny F. Talantsev, Wayne P. Crump, Jeffery L. Tallon

arXiv:1609.03670 · DOI 10.1002/andp.201700197 · 2016-09-13 · Annalen der Physik

T1experimental56 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Key questions for any superconductor include: what is its maximum dissipation-free electrical current (its `critical current') and can this be used to extract fundamental thermodynamic parameters? Present models focus on depinning of magnetic vortices and implicate materials engineering to maximise pinning performance. But recently we showed that the self-field critical current for thin films is a universal property, independent of microstructure, controlled only by the penetration depth. Here we generalise this observation to include thin films, wires or nanowires of single- or multi-band s-wave and d-wave superconductors. Using extended BCS theory we consider dissipation-free self-field transport currents as Meissner-London currents, avoiding the concept of pinning altogether. We find quite generally, for type I or type II superconductors, the current is limited by the relevant critical field divided by the penetration depth. Our fits to 62 available data sets, from zinc nanowires to compressed sulphur hydride with critical temperatures of 0.65 to 203 K, respectively, are excellent. Extracted London penetration depths, superconducting energy gaps and specific heat jumps agree well with reported bulk values. For multiband or multiphase samples we accurately recover individual band contributions and phase fractions.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Zn

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.65Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers