Towards a quantitative description of tunneling conductance of superconductors: application to LiFeAs
A. Kreisel, R. Nelson, T. Berlijn, W. Ku, Ramakrishna Aluru, Shun Chi, Haibiao Zhou, Udai Raj Singh, Peter Wahl, Ruixing Liang, Walter N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, P. J. Hirschfeld, Brian M. Andersen
arXiv:1610.00619 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.224518 · 2016-10-03 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Since the discovery of iron-based superconductors, a number of theories have been put forward to explain the qualitative origin of pairing, but there have been few attempts to make quantitative, material-specific comparisons to experimental results. The spin-fluctuation theory of electronic pairing, based on first-principles electronic structure calculations, makes predictions for the superconducting gap. Within the same framework, the surface wave functions may also be calculated, allowing, e.g., for detailed comparisons between theoretical results and measured scanning tunneling topographs and spectra. Here we present such a comparison between theory and experiment on the Fe-based superconductor LiFeAs. Results for the homogeneous surface as well as impurity states are presented as a benchmark test of the theory. For the homogeneous system, we argue that the maxima of topographic image intensity may be located at positions above either the As or Li atoms, depending on tip height and the setpoint current of the measurement. We further report the experimental observation of transitions between As and Li-registered lattices as functions of both tip height and setpoint bias, in agreement with this prediction. Next, we give a detailed comparison between the simulated scanning tunneling microscopy images of transition-metal defects with experiment. Finally, we discuss possible extensions of the current framework to obtain a theory with true predictive power for scanning tunneling microscopy in Fe-based systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Phase solitons and subgap excitations in two-band superconductors
similarity 0.90K. V. Samokhin · 2012 · arXiv:1207.4494
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of Quasiparticle Interference Test for Sign-changing Gaps in Multiband Superconductors
similarity 0.90Johannes H. J. Martiny et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.04891
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital selective pairing and gap structures of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89Kreisel, Andreas et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1611.02643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity and vortex States in the bilayer high-temperature superconductor
similarity 0.88Junkang Huang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.07651
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two bands Ising superconductivity from Coulomb interactions in monolayer NbSe
similarity 0.88Sebastian Hörhold et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.06645
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective Hamiltonian for FeAs based superconductors
similarity 0.88Efstratios Manousakis et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.3432
Source status unknown — claims are unverified