Direct observation of charge order in underdoped and optimally doped Bi$_{2}$(Sr,La)$_{2}$CuO$_{6+δ}$ by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering
Y. Y. Peng, M. Salluzzo, X. Sun, A. Ponti, D. Betto, A. M. Ferretti, F. Fumagalli, K. Kummer, M. Le Tacon, X. J. Zhou, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, G. Ghiringhelli
arXiv:1610.01823 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.184511 · 2016-10-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Charge order in underdoped and optimally doped high-$T_\mathrm{c}$ superconductors Bi$_{2}$Sr$_{2-x}$La$_x$CuO$_{6+δ}$ (Bi2201) is investigated by Cu $L_3$ edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS). We have directly observed charge density modulation in the optimally doped Bi2201 at momentum transfer $Q_{\|} \simeq 0.23$ rlu, with smaller intensity and correlation length with respect to the underdoped sample. This demonstrates that short-range charge order in Bi2201 persists up to optimal doping, as in other hole-doped cuprates. We explored the nodal (diagonal) direction and found no charge order peak, confirming that charge order modulates only along the Cu-O bond directions. We measured the out-of-plane dependence of charge order, finding a flat response and no maxima at half integer \emph{L} values. This suggests there is no out-of-plane phase correlation in single layer Bi2201, at variance from YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+x}$ and La$_{2-x}$(Ba,Sr)$_x$CuO$_4$. Combining our results with data from the literature we assess that charge order in Bi2201 exists in a large doping range across the phase diagram, i.e. $0.07 \lesssim p \lesssim 0.16$, demonstrating thereby that it is intimately entangled with the antiferromagnetic background, the pseudogap and superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 33 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Photoemission perspective on pseudogap, superconducting fluctuations, and charge order in cuprates: a review of recent progress
similarity 0.92Inna Vishik · 2018 · arXiv:1803.11228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density wave fluctuations in La2−xSrxCuO4 and their competition with superconductivity
similarity 0.91T. P. Croft et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synchrotron x-ray scattering study of charge-density-wave order in HgBaCuO
similarity 0.91W. Tabis et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.03348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Effect of Pointlike Impurities on d_{x^2-y^2} Charge Density Waves in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.91W. A. Atkinson & A. P. Kampf · 2015 · arXiv:1502.03298
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Adiabatic variation of the charge-density-wave phase diagram in the 123 cuprate (CaLa)(BaLa)CuO
similarity 0.91M. Bluschke et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1906.05021
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-density-wave order takes over antiferromagnetism in BiSrLaCuO superconductors
similarity 0.90S. Kawasaki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.06169
Source status unknown — claims are unverified