Superconductivity without hole-pocket in electron-doped FeSe: Analysis beyond the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism
Yamakawa, Youichi, Kontani, Hiroshi
arXiv:1611.05375 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045130 · 2017-07-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
High-Tc pairing mechanism absent of hole-pockets in heavily electron-doped FeSe is one of the key unsolved problems in Fe-based superconductors. Here, this problem is attacked by focusing on the higher-order many-body effects neglected in conventional Migdal-Eliashberg formalism. We uncover two significant many-body effects for high-Tc superconductivity: (i) Due to the "vertex correction", the dressed multiorbital Coulomb interaction acquires prominent orbital dependence for low-energy electrons. The dressed Coulomb interaction not only induces the orbital fluctuations, but also magnifies the electron-boson coupling constant. Therefore, moderate orbital fluctuations give strong attractive pairing interaction. (ii) The "multi-fluctuation-exchange pairing process" causes large inter-pocket attractive force, which is as important as usual single-fluctuation-exchange process. Due to these two significant effects dropped in the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism, the anisotropic $s_{++}$-wave state in heavily electron-doped FeSe is satisfactorily explained. The proposed "inter-electron-pocket pairing mechanism" will enlarge Tc in other Fe-based superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 70 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (Li0.8Fe0.2)OHFeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity without a hole pocket in electron-doped FeSe: Analysis beyond the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism
similarity 0.90Youichi Yamakawa & Hiroshi Kontani
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Superconductivity near a Nematic Instability in a Multi-Orbital system
similarity 0.90Kazi Ranjibul Islam & Andrey Chubukov · 2023 · arXiv:2310.17728
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of superconductivity in Fe-based systems with doping
similarity 0.89S. Maiti et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1104.1814
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Argument on superconductivity pairing mechanism from cobalt impurity doping in FeSe: spin () or orbital () fluctuation
similarity 0.89T. Urata et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.04605
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of spin-orbit coupling on spin-fluctuation induced pairing in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89Daniel D. Scherer & Brian M. Andersen · 2019 · arXiv:1909.01313
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature dependence of lower critical field Hc1(T) shows nodeless superconductivity in FeSe
similarity 0.89M. Abdel-Hafiez et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.0614
Source status unknown — claims are unverified