The interface between Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ and Ru-metal inclusion--Implications for its superconductivity
Ghosh, Soham S., Xin, Yan, Mao, Zhiqiang, Manousakis, Efstratios
arXiv:1611.07130 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184506 · 2017-11-15
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Under various conditions of the growth process, when the presumably unconventional superconductor Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ (SRO) contains micro-inclusions of Ru metal, the superconducting critical temperature increases significantly. An STEM study shows a sharp interface geometry which allows crystals of SRO and of Ru-metal to grow side by side by forming a commensurate superlattice structure at the interface. In an attempt to shed light as to why this happens, we investigated the atomic structure and electronic properties of the interface between the oxide and the metal micro-inclusions using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Our results support the observed structure indicating that it is energetically favored over other types of Ru-metal/SRO interfaces. We find that a $t_{2g}$-$e_g$ orbital mixing occurs at the interface with significantly enhanced magnetic moments. Based on our findings, we argue that an inclusion mediated interlayer coupling reduces phase fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter which could explain the observed enhancement of the superconducting critical temperature in SRO samples containing micro-inclusions.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Interface between Sr2RuO4 and Ru-metal inclusion: Implications for its superconductivity
similarity 0.91Soham S. Ghosh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interface superconductivity in the eutectic Sr2RuO4−Ru: 3-K phase of Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.90Hiroshi Yaguchi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital Symmetry and Orbital Excitations in High- Superconductors
similarity 0.90Andrzej M. Oleś et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.02594
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit induced mixed-parity pairing in SrRuO: a quantum many-body calculation
similarity 0.90J. J. Deisz & T. E. Kidd · 2011 · arXiv:1107.1757
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling properties at the interface between superconducting Sr2RuO4 and a Ru micro-inclusion
similarity 0.90M. Kawamura et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0408524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mechanism of spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.90Masatoshi Sato & Mahito Kohmoto · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0003046
Source status unknown — claims are unverified