← Back to search

Universality and unconventional enhancement of flux-flow resistivity in Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$

Xinyi Huang, D. J. Haney, Y. P. Singh, T. Hu, H. Xiao, Hai-Hu Wen, M. Dzero, Carmen. C. Almasan

arXiv:1612.01961 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.184513 · 2016-12-06 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical1 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Measurements of the current-voltage characteristics were performed on Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$ single crystals with doping level $0.044 \leq x \leq 0.1$. An unconventional increase in the flux-flow resistivity $ρ_{\rm ff}$ with decreasing magnetic field was observed across this doping range. Such an abnormal field dependence of flux-flow resistivity is in contrast with the linear field dependence of $ρ_{\rm ff}$ in conventional type-II superconductors, but is similar to the behavior recently observed in the heavy-fermion superconductor CeCoIn$_5$. A significantly enhanced $ρ_{\rm ff}$ was found for the x=0.06 single crystals, implying a strong single-particle energy dissipation around the vortex cores. At different temperatures and fields and for a given doping concentration, the normalized $ρ_{\rm ff}$ scales with normalized field and temperature. The doping level dependence of these parameters strongly suggests that the abnormal upturn flux-flow resisitivity is likely related to the enhancement of spin fluctuations around the vortex cores of the optimally doped samples.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba(Fe0.94Co0.06)2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

23.67Pressure not reportedonset
Ba(Fe0.956Co0.044)2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

16.6Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers