Spectral Classification of Coupling Regimes in the Quantum Rabi Model
Daniel Z. Rossatto, Celso J. Villas-Bôas, Mikel Sanz, Enrique Solano
arXiv:1612.03090 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.013849 · 2016-12-09 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The quantum Rabi model is in the scientific spotlight due to the recent theoretical and experimental progress. Nevertheless, a full-fledged classification of its coupling regimes remains as a relevant open question. We propose a spectral classification dividing the coupling regimes into three regions based on the validity of perturbative criteria on the quantum Rabi model, which allows us the use of exactly solvable effective Hamiltonians. These coupling regimes are i) the perturbative ultrastrong coupling regime which comprises the Jaynes-Cummings model, ii) a region where non-perturbative ultrastrong and non-perturbative deep strong coupling regimes coexist, and iii) the perturbative deep strong coupling regime. We show that this spectral classification depends not only on the ratio between the coupling strength and the natural frequencies of the unperturbed parts, but also on the energy to which the system can access. These regimes additionally discriminate the completely different behaviors of several static physical properties, namely the total number of excitations, the photon statistics of the field, and the cavity-qubit entanglement. Finally, we explain the dynamical properties which are traditionally associated to the deep strong coupling regime, such as the collapses and revivals of the state population, in the frame of the proposed spectral classification.
Similar papers
Broken selection rule in the quantum Rabi model
similarity 0.87P. Forn-Díaz et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.03379
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction
similarity 0.87P. Forn-Díaz et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.09275
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS models of Josephson qubits I. Energy spectra
similarity 0.86Alicki, R. & Miklaszewski, W. · 2010 · arXiv:1012.0140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entanglement modes and topological phase transitions in superconductors
similarity 0.86T. P. Oliveira & P. D. Sacramento · 2015 · arXiv:1503.05154
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Qubit-oscillator system under ultrastrong coupling and extreme driving
similarity 0.86Johannes Hausinger & Milena Grifoni · 2010 · arXiv:1009.1485
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Deep Strong Coupling Regime of the Jaynes-Cummings model
similarity 0.86J. Casanova et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.1240
Source status unknown — claims are unverified