Interplay between magnetism, superconductivity, and orbital order in a 5-pocket model for iron-based superconductors - a parquet renormalization group study
Laura Classen, Rui-Qi Xing, Maxim Khodas, Andrey V. Chubukov
arXiv:1612.08708 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.037001 · 2016-12-27 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the results of the parquet renormalization group (RG) analysis of the phase diagram of the most general 5-pocket model for Fe-based superconductors. We use as an input the orbital structure of excitations near the five pockets made out of $d_{xz}$, $d_{yz}$, and $d_{xy}$ orbitals and argue that there are 40 different interactions between low-energy fermions in the orbital basis. All interactions flow under RG, as one progressively integrates out fermions with higher energies. We find that the low-energy behavior is amazingly simple, despite the large number of interactions. Namely, at low-energies the full 5-pocket model effectively reduces either to a 3-pocket model made of one $d_{xy}$ hole pocket and two electron pockets, or a 4-pocket model made of two $d_{xz}/d_{yz}$ hole pockets and two electron pockets. The leading instability in the effective 4-pocket model is a spontaneous orbital (nematic) order, followed by $s^{+-}$ superconductivity. In the effective 3-pocket model orbital fluctuations are weaker, and the system develops either $s^{+-}$ superconductivity or stripe SDW. In the latter case, nematicity is induced by composite spin fluctuations.
Similar papers
Interplay between Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Orbital Order in 5-Pocket Model for Iron-Based Superconductors: Parquet Renormalization Group Study
similarity 0.92Laura Classen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematic order in iron superconductors - who is in the driver's seat?
similarity 0.89R. M. Fernandes et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1312.6085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe
similarity 0.89Anna E. Böhmer & Andreas Kreisel · 2017 · arXiv:1711.06473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Renormalization group flow, competing phases, and the structure of superconducting gap in multi-band models of Iron based superconductors
similarity 0.89Saurabh Maiti & Andrey V. Chubukov · 2010 · arXiv:1010.0984
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism, superconductivity, and spontaneous orbital order in iron-based superconductors: who comes first and why?
similarity 0.89Andrey V. Chubukov et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1602.05503
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between tetragonal magnetic order, stripe magnetism, and superconductivity in iron-based materials
similarity 0.89Jian Kang et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.7079
Source status unknown — claims are unverified