AC-Biased Shift Registers as Fabrication Process Benchmark Circuits and Flux Trapping Diagnostic Tool
Vasili K. Semenov, Yuri A. Polyakov, Sergey K. Tolpygo
arXiv:1701.03837 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2017.2669585 · 2016-12-29 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We develop an ac-biased shift register introduced in our previous work (V.K. Semenov et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 25, no. 3, 1301507, June 2015) into a benchmark circuit for evaluation of superconductor electronics fabrication technology. The developed testing technique allows for extracting margins of all individual cells in the shift register, which in turn makes it possible to estimate statistical distribution of Josephson junctions in the circuit. We applied this approach to successfully test registers having 8, 16, 36, and 202 thousand cells and, respectively, about 33000, 65000, 144000, and 809000 Josephson junctions. The circuits were fabricated at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, using a fully planarized process, 0.4 μm inductor linewidth, and 1.33x10^6 cm^-2 junction density. They are presently the largest operational superconducting SFQ circuits ever made. The developed technique distinguishes between hard defects (fabrication-related) and soft defects (measurement-related) and locates them in the circuit. The soft defects are specific to superconducting circuits and caused by magnetic flux trapping either inside the active cells or in the dedicated flux-trapping moats near the cells. The number and distribution of soft defects depend on the ambient magnetic field and vary with thermal cycling even if done in the same magnetic environment.
Similar papers
Characterization of Flux Trapping in and Fabrication of Large-Scale Superconductor Circuits Using AC-Biased Shift Registers With 108500 Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.90Evan B. Golden et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2501.03343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extraction and Simulation of the Impact of Flux Trapping in Moats of AC-Biased Shift Registers
similarity 0.85Scott E. Meninger & Sergey K. Tolpygo · 2024 · arXiv:2411.02749
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BioSFQ circuit family for neuromorphic computing: Bridging digital and analog domains of superconductor technologies
similarity 0.83Vasili K. Semenov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.13657
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Wafer-Scale Characterization of a Superconductor Integrated Circuit Fabrication Process, Using a Cryogenic Wafer Prober
similarity 0.81Joshua T. West et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.00705
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optimal control for fast and high-fidelity quantum gates in coupled superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.81Shang-Yu Huang & Hsi-Sheng Goan · 2014 · arXiv:1406.7707
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Force Microscopy for Diagnosis of Complex Superconducting Circuits
similarity 0.81S.Yu. Grebenchuk et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified