← Back to search

Anti-Lenz Supercurrents in Superconducting Spin Valves

Ury D. Chacón, Magda B. Fontes, E. Baggio-Saitovich, Marcos A. Sousa, C. Enderlein

arXiv:1701.06322 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.184509 · 2017-01-23 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T1theoretical5 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Here, we present a study on Si(111)/\-Ta($150$Å)/\-IrMn($150$Å)/\-NiFe($50$Å)/\-Nb($x$)/\-NiFe($50$Å)/\-Ta($50$Å) and Si(111)/\-Ta($150$Å)/\-NiFe($50$Å)/\-Nb($x$)/\-NiFe($50$Å)/\-IrMn($150$Å)/\-Ta($50$Å) spin-valves with $x=100$ to $500$Å. For both sample families, above a specific critical thickness of the Nb-layer and below $T_c$, the superconducting Nb-layer contributes strongly to the magnetization. These systems show an anomalous hysteresis loop in the magnetization of the superconducting layer; the hysteresis loop is similar to what is generally expected from hard superconductors and many superconductor/ferromagnet hybrid systems, but the direction of the hysteresis loop is inverted, compared to what is generally observed (paramagnetic for up sweeping fields and diamagnetic for down sweeping fields). This means that the respective samples exhibit a magnetization, which is contrary to what should be expected from the Lenz' rule.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.89Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers