Band-structure-dependence of renormalization-group prediction on pairing channels
Yi-Ting Hsu, Alejandro Federico Rebola, Craig J. Fennie, Eun-Ah Kim
arXiv:1701.07884 · 2017-01-26 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent experimental advances in using strain engineering to significantly alter the band structure of moderately correlated systems offer opportunities and challenges to weak-coupling renormalization group (RG) analysis approaches for predicting superconducting instabilities. On one hand, the RG approach can provide theoretical guidance. On the other hand, it is now imperative to better understand how the predictions of the RG approach depends on microscopic and non-universal model details. Here we focus on the effect of band-selective mass-renormalization often observed in angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Focusing on a specific example of uniaxially strained $\rm{Sr_2RuO_4}$ we carry out the weak-coupling RG analysis from two sets of band structures as starting points: one is based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations and the other is based on angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements. Despite good agreement between the Fermi surfaces of the the two band structures we find the two sets of band structures to predict qualitatively different trends in the strain dependence of the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ as well as the dominant channel.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Off-site-repulsion induced Triplet Superconductivity: a possibility of chiral p pairing in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Ryotaro Arita et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Formation of non-unitary state near the upper-critical field of SrRuO
similarity 0.89Masafumi Udagawa et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0509082
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evaluation of Spin-Triplet Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.89Yoshiteru Maeno et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.1620
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of tunneling spectroscopy in SrRuO
similarity 0.89Keiji Yada et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.4682
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetry and dominant band in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.89T. Scaffidi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1401.0016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing mechanism in multiband superconductors
similarity 0.89Wen-Min Huang & Hsiu-Hau Lin · 2011 · arXiv:1107.1796
Source status unknown — claims are unverified