The correlation between the Nernst effect and fluctuation diamagnetism in strongly fluctuating superconductors
Kingshuk Sarkar, Sumilan Banerjee, Subroto Mukerjee, T. V. Ramakrishnan
arXiv:1701.08091 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/aa72ac · 2017-01-27 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the Nernst effect in fluctuating superconductors by calculating the transport coefficient $α_{xy}$ in a phenomenological model where relative importance of phase and amplitude fluctuations of the order parameter is tuned continuously to smoothly evolve from an effective XY model to more conventional Ginzburg-Landau description. To connect with a concrete experimental realization we choose the model parameters appropriate for cuprate superconductors and calculate $α_{xy}$ and the magnetization ${\bf M}$ over the entire range of experimentally accessible values of field, temperature and doping. We argue that $α_{xy}$ and ${\bf M}$ are both determined by the equilibrium properties of the superconducting fluctuations (and not their dynamics) despite the former being a transport quantity. Thus, the experimentally observed correlation between the Nernst signal and the magnetization arises primarily from the correlation between $α_{xy}$ and ${\bf M}$. Further, there exists a dimensionless ratio ${\bf M}/(T α_{xy})$ that quantifies this correlation. We calculate, for the first time, this ratio over the entire phase diagram of the cuprates and find it agrees with previous results obtained in specific parts of the phase diagram. We conclude that that there appears to be no sharp distinction between the regimes dominated by phase fluctuations and Gaussian fluctuations for this ratio in contrast to $α_{xy}$ and ${\bf M}$ individually. The utility of this ratio is that it can be used to determine the extent to which superconducting fluctuations contribute to the Nernst effect in different parts of the phase diagram given the measured values of magnetization.
Similar papers
Nernst Effect and Diamagnetism in Phase Fluctuating Superconductors
similarity 0.91Daniel Podolsky et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter as an origin of the Nernst effect
similarity 0.90Karen Michaeli & Alexander M. Finkel'stein · 2008 · arXiv:0812.4268
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect in the vortex-liquid regime of a type-II superconductor
similarity 0.90Subroto Mukerjee & David A. Huse · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307005
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect in metals and superconductors: a review of concepts and experiments
similarity 0.90Kamran Behnia & Hervé Aubin · 2016 · arXiv:1601.06647
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Nernst effect from fluctuating pairs in the pseudogap phase
similarity 0.90A. Levchenko et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.2213
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst effect and diamagnetism in phase fluctuating superconductors
similarity 0.89Daniel Podolsky et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612096
Source status unknown — claims are unverified