Anisotropy of magnetic interactions and symmetry of the order parameter in unconventional superconductor Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$
Bongjae Kim, Sergii Khmelevskyi, I. I. Mazin, D. F. Agterberg, Cesare Franchini
arXiv:1702.03784 · DOI 10.1038/s41535-017-0041-8 · 2017-02-13 · npj Quantum Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ is the best candidate for spin-triplet superconductivity, an unusual and elusive superconducting state of fundamental importance. In the last three decades Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ has been very carefully studied and despite its apparent simplicity when compared with strongly correlated high-$T_{c}$ cuprates, for which the pairing symmetry is understood, there is no scenario that can explain all the major experimental observations, a conundrum that has generated tremendous interest. Here we present a density-functional based analysis of magnetic interactions in Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$ and discuss the role of magnetic anisotropy in its unconventional superconductivity. Our goal is twofold. First, we access the possibility of the superconducting order parameter rotation in an external magnetic field of 200 Oe, and conclude that the spin-orbit interaction in this material is several orders of magnitude too strong to be consistent with this hypothesis. Thus, the observed invariance of the Knight shift across $T_{c}$ has no plausible explanation, and casts doubt on using the Knight shift as an ultimate litmus paper for the pairing symmetry. Second, we propose a quantitative double-exchange-like model for combining itinerant fermions with an anisotropic Heisenberg magnetic Hamiltonian. This model is complementary to the Hubbard-model-based calculations published so far, and forms an alternative framework for exploring superconducting symmetry in Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}.$ As an example, we use this model to analyze the degeneracy between various $p-$triplet states in the simplest mean-field approximation, and show that it splits into a single and two doublets with the ground state defined by the competition between the "Ising" and "compass" anisotropic terms.
Similar papers
Why Scanning Tunneling Microscopy on SrRuO sometimes doesn't see the superconducting gap
similarity 0.93Adrian Valadkhani et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenology of the superconducting state in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.92M. Sigrist et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9902214
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Neutron scattering studies on spin fluctuations in SrRuO
similarity 0.92K. Jenni et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.06636
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin waves in a two dimensional p-wave superconductor: SrRuO
similarity 0.92Hae-Young Kee et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-triplet superconductivity in SrRuO probed by Andreev reflection
similarity 0.92F. Laube et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907267
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of deep superconducting gap minima and disorder on residual thermal transport in
similarity 0.92John F. Dodaro et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.00932
Source status unknown — claims are unverified