Flux-flow and vortex-glass phase in iron pnictide BaFe$_{2-x}$Ni$_x$As$_2$ single crystals with $T_c$ $\sim$ 20 K
S Salem-Sugui, A D Alvarenga, H-Q Luo, R Zhang, D-L Gong
arXiv:1703.07730 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/30/1/015007 · 2017-03-22 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analysed the flux-flow region of isofield magneto resistivity data obtained on three crystals of BaFe$_{2-x}$Ni$_x$As$_2$ with $T_c$$\sim$20 K for three different geometries relative to the angle formed between the applied magnetic field and the c-axis of the crystals. The field dependent activation energy, $U_0$, was obtained from the TAFF and modified vortex-glass models, which were compared with the values of $U_0$ obtained from flux-creep available in the literature. We observed that the $U_0$ obtained from the TAFF model show deviations among the different crystals, while the correspondent glass lines obtained from the vortex glass model are virtually coincident. It is shown that the data is well explained by the modified vortex glass model, allowing to extract values of $T_g$, the glass transition temperature, and $T^*$, a temperature which scales with the mean field critical temperature $T_c(H)$. The resulting glass lines obey the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau theory and are well fitted by a theory developed in the literature by considering the effect of disorder.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaFe1.904Ni0.096As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.8 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| BaFe1.904Ni0.096As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.7 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| BaFe1.902Ni0.098As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19.8 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| BaFe2-xNixAs2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ca0.82La0.18FeAs2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeFeAsOF Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsO0.9F0.1 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2-xCoxAs2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (Ba,K)Fe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeTe0.60Se0.40 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Fe1.04Te0.6Se0.4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Doping Dependence of the Second Magnetization Peak, Critical Current Density and Pinning Mechanism in BaFeNiAs Pnictide Superconductors
similarity 0.89Shyam Sundar et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1901.10049
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Second magnetization peak, anomalous field penetration, and Josephson vortices in KCaFeAsF bilayer pnictide superconductor
similarity 0.89P. V. Lopes et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.15855
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex glass line and vortex liquid resistivity in doped BaFe2As2 single crystals
similarity 0.89S. R. Ghorbani et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.3837
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux dynamics associated with the second magnetization peak in the iron pnictide Ba1−xKxFe2As2
similarity 0.89S. Salem-Sugui, Jr. et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex dynamics as a function of field orientation in BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2
similarity 0.88Salem-Sugui, S. et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1212.3477
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disorder, critical currents, and vortex pinning energies in isovalently substituted BaFe(AsP)
similarity 0.88Sultan Demirdis et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.3382
Source status unknown — claims are unverified