Error-transparent quantum gates for small logical qubit architectures
Eliot Kapit
arXiv:1703.09762 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.050503 · 2017-03-28 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
One of the largest obstacles to building a quantum computer is gate error, where the physical evolution of the state of a qubit or group of qubits during a gate operation does not match the intended unitary transformation. Gate error stems from a combination of control errors and random single qubit errors from interaction with the environment. While great strides have been made in mitigating control errors, intrinsic qubit error remains a serious problem that sets the primary limit for gate fidelity in modern superconducting qubit architectures. Simultaneously, recent developments of small error-corrected logical qubit devices promise significant increases in logical state lifetime, but translating those improvements into increases in gate fidelity is a complex challenge. In this Letter, we propose a new formalism for implementing gates on and between small logical qubit devices which inherit the parent device's tolerance to single qubit errors which occur at any time before or during the gate. Using a standard phenomenological noise model for superconducting qubits, we demonstrate a universal one- and two-qubit gate set with error rates an order of magnitude lower than those for equivalent operations on single qubits or pairs of qubits, running for the same total duration. The effective logical gate error rate in these models displays superlinear error reduction with linear increases in single qubit lifetime, proving that passive error correction is capable of increasing gate fidelity. These developments further suggest that incorporating small logical qubits into a measurement based code could substantially improve code performance.
Similar papers
ZZ freedom in two qubit gates
similarity 0.85Xuexin Xu & M. H. Ansari · 2020 · arXiv:2009.00485
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear resonant behavior of the dispersive readout scheme for a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.85Janice C. Lee et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0609561
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hamiltonian Extrema of an Arbitrary Flux-Biased Josephson Circuit
similarity 0.85A. Miano et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.03155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterizing two-dimensional superconductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits
similarity 0.84Pavel E. Dolgirev et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetry of twisted bilayer graphene: a phenomenological synthesis
similarity 0.83Ethan Lake et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.12579
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Introduction to Quantum Electromagnetic Circuits
similarity 0.83Uri Vool & Michel H. Devoret · 2016 · arXiv:1610.03438
Source status unknown — claims are unverified