Maximizing Tc by tuning nematicity and magnetism in FeSe1-xSx superconductors
K. Matsuura, Y. Mizukami, Y. Arai, Y. Sugimura, N. Maejima, A. Machida, T. Watanuki, T. Fukuda, T. Yajima, Z. Hiroi, K. Y. Yip, Y. C. Chan, Q. Niu, S. Hosoi, K. Ishida, K. Mukasa, S. Kasahara, J. -G. Cheng, S. K. Goh, Y. Matsuda, Y. Uwatoko, T. Shibauchi
arXiv:1704.02057 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01277-x · 2017-04-07 · Nature Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A fundamental issue concerning iron-based superconductivity is the roles of electronic nematicity and magnetism in realising high transition temperature ($T_{\rm c}$). To address this issue, FeSe is a key material, as it exhibits a unique pressure phase diagram involving nonmagnetic nematic and pressure-induced antiferromagnetic ordered phases. However, as these two phases in FeSe overlap with each other, the effects of two orders on superconductivity remain perplexing. Here we construct the three-dimensional electronic phase diagram, temperature ($T$) against pressure ($P$) and isovalent S-substitution ($x$), for FeSe$_{1-x}$S$_{x}$, in which we achieve a complete separation of nematic and antiferromagnetic phases. In between, an extended nonmagnetic tetragonal phase emerges, where we find a striking enhancement of $T_{\rm c}$. The completed phase diagram uncovers two superconducting domes with similarly high $T_{\rm c}$ on both ends of the dome-shaped antiferromagnetic phase. The $T_{\rm c}(P,x)$ variation implies that nematic fluctuations unless accompanying magnetism are not relevant for high-$T_{\rm c}$ superconductivity in this system.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe1-xSx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe1-xSx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nematic quantum critical point without magnetism in FeSe1-xSx superconductors
similarity 0.91S. Hosoi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1604.00184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of strain on the electronic structure, superconductivity, and nematicity in FeSe studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.90G. N. Phan et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.05129
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossover of Superconductivity across the antiferromagnetic end point in FeSeS under pressure
similarity 0.90Kiyotaka Miyoshi et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2505.04156
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural and optical investigations of the iron-chalcogenide superconductor FeSeTe under high pressure
similarity 0.90Pallavi S. Malavi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.3367
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous high-magnetic field electronic state of the nematic superconductors FeSeS
similarity 0.89M. Bristow et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.02522
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong correlation between -linear magnetoresistance and strange metal in FeSe superconductor
similarity 0.89Xinyue Wang et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.15266
Source status unknown — claims are unverified