Optical signatures of the superconducting Goldstone mode in granular aluminum: experiments and theory
Uwe S. Pracht, Tommaso Cea, Nimrod Bachar, Guy Deutscher, Eli Farber, Martin Dressel, Marc Scheffler, Claudio Castellani, Antonio M. Garcia-Garcia, Lara Benfatto
arXiv:1705.03252 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094514 · 2017-05-09 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent advances in the experimental growth and control of disordered thin films, heterostructures, and interfaces provide a fertile ground for the observation and characterisation of the collective superconducting excitations emerging below $T_c$ after breaking the $U(1)$ gauge symmetry. Here we combine THz experiments in a nano-structured granular Al thin film and theoretical calculations to demonstrate the existence of optically-active phase modes, which represent the Goldstone excitations of the broken gauge symmetry. By measuring the complex transmission trough the sample we identify a sizeable and temperature-dependent optical sub-gap absorption, which cannot be ascribed to quasiparticle excitations. A quantitative modelling of this material as a disordered Josephson array of nano-grains allows us to determine, with no free parameters, the structure of the spatial inhomogeneities induced by shell effects. Besides being responsible for the enhancement of the critical temperature with respect to bulk Al, already observed in the past, this spatial inhomogeneity provides a mechanism for the optical visibility of the Goldstone mode. By computing explicitly the optical spectrum of the superconducting phase fluctuations we obtain a good quantitative description of the experimental data. Our results demonstrate that nanograins arrays are a promising setting to study and control the collective superconducting excitations via optical means.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.74 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.19 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.08 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Optical signatures of the superconducting Goldstone mode in granular aluminum: Experiments and theory
similarity 0.94Uwe S. Pracht et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamics of granular aluminum from superconductor to insulator: observation of collective superconducting modes
similarity 0.90F. Levy-Bertrand et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.05843
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrodynamics of granular aluminum from superconductor to insulator: Observation of collective superconducting modes
similarity 0.89F. Levy-Bertrand et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Superconductivity in Proximity to Peaks in Densities of States
similarity 0.88Joshua Althüser et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.11451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical excitation of phase modes in strongly disordered superconductors
similarity 0.88T. Cea et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of collective excitations in weakly coupled disordered superconductors
similarity 0.87Bo Fan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified