Incoherent superconductivity well above $T_c$ in high-$T_c$ cuprates - harmonizing the spectroscopic and thermodynamic data
J. G. Storey
arXiv:1707.08648 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/aa79bf · 2017-07-26 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Cuprate superconductors have long been known to exhibit an energy gap that persists high above the superconducting transition temperature ($T_c$). Debate has continued now for decades as to whether it is a precursor superconducting gap or a pseudogap arising from some competing correlation. Failure to resolve this has arguably delayed explaining the origins of superconductivity in these highly complex materials. Here we effectively settle the question by calculating a variety of thermodynamic and spectroscopic properties, exploring the effect of a temperature-dependent pair-breaking term in the self-energy in the presence of pairing interactions that persist well above $T_c$. We start by fitting the detailed temperature-dependence of the electronic specific heat and immediately can explain its hitherto puzzling field dependence. Taking this same combination of pairing temperature and pair-breaking scattering we are then able to simultaneously describe in detail the unusual temperature and field dependence of the superfluid density, tunneling, Raman and optical spectra, which otherwise defy explanation in terms a superconducting gap that closes conventionally at $T_c$. These findings demonstrate that the gap above $T_c$ in the overdoped regime likely originates from incoherent superconducting correlations, and is distinct from the competing-order "pseudogap" that appears at lower doping.
Similar papers
Evidence for a metallic--like state in the T=0 K phase diagram of a high temperature superconductor
similarity 0.94A. A. Schmidt et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0504343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Field determination of superconducting fluctuations in high-Tc cuprates
similarity 0.93F. Rullier-Albenque et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.5205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprates phase diagram deduced from magnetic susceptibility: what is the `true' pseudogap line?
similarity 0.92Yves Noat et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.02589
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of pseudogap formation on the penetration depth of underdoped high cuprates
similarity 0.92J. P. Carbotte et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0909.3814
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Relationships between the superconducting gap, pseudogap and transition temperature in High-T_c superconductors
similarity 0.91M. Ya. Amusia & V. R. Shaginyan · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110127
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing, Pseudogap and Fermi Arcs in Cuprates
similarity 0.91Adam Kaminski et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.0492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified