Superconductivity, charge-density waves, antiferromagnetism, and phase separation in the Hubbard-Holstein model
Seher Karakuzu, Luca F. Tocchio, Sandro Sorella, Federico Becca
arXiv:1709.00278 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205145 · 2017-09-01 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By using variational wave functions and quantum Monte Carlo techniques, we investigate the interplay between electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions in the two-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model. Here, the ground-state phase diagram is triggered by several energy scales, i.e., the electron hopping $t$, the on-site electron-electron interaction $U$, the phonon energy $ω_0$, and the electron-phonon coupling $g$. At half filling, the ground state is an antiferromagnetic insulator for $U \gtrsim 2g^2/ω_0$, while it is a charge-density-wave (or bi-polaronic) insulator for $U \lesssim 2g^2/ω_0$. In addition to these phases, we find a superconducting phase that intrudes between them. For $ω_0/t=1$, superconductivity emerges when both $U/t$ and $2g^2/tω_0$ are small; then, by increasing the value of the phonon energy $ω_0$, it extends along the transition line between antiferromagnetic and charge-density-wave insulators. Away from half filling, phase separation occurs when doping the charge-density-wave insulator, while a uniform (superconducting) ground state is found when doping the superconducting phase. In the analysis of finite-size effects, it is extremely important to average over twisted boundary conditions, especially in the weak-coupling limit and in the doped case.
Similar papers
Phase diagram of one-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model at quarter-filling
similarity 0.91Sahinur Reja et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1012.2542
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Breakdown of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory and a theory of lattice-fermionic superfluidity
similarity 0.91Emil A. Yuzbashyan & Boris L. Altshuler · 2022 · arXiv:2206.01593
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and superconducting order parameter phase fluctuations in a weakly doped antiferromagnet
similarity 0.90V. M. Loktev & V. M. Turkowski · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610849
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Digital-analog quantum computing of fermion-boson models in superconducting circuits
similarity 0.90Shubham Kumar et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.12040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagram for the one-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model: A density-matrix renormalization group study
similarity 0.90Masaki Tezuka et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0707.3197
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of the superconducting order parameter in the two-dimensional negative-U Hubbard model by grand-canonical twist-averaged boundary conditions
similarity 0.90Seher Karakuzu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified