Angular dependence of vortex instability in a layered superconductor: the case study of Fe(Se,Te) material
Gaia Grimaldi, Antonio Leo, Angela Nigro, Sandro Pace, Valeria Braccini, Emilio Bellingeri, Carlo Ferdeghini
arXiv:1709.05089 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-22417-3 · 2017-09-15 · Scientific Reports
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Anisotropy effects on flux pinning and flux flow are strongly effective in cuprate as well as iron-based superconductors due to their intrinsically layered crystallographic structure. However $\textrm{Fe(Se,Te)}$ thin films grown on $\textrm{CaF}_2$ substrate result less anisotropic with respect to all the other iron based superconductors. We present the first study on the angular dependence of the flux flow instability, which occurs in the flux flow regime as a current driven transition to the normal state at the instability point ($I^*$,$V^*$) in the current-voltage characteristics. The voltage jumps are systematically investigated as a function of the temperature, the external magnetic field, and the angle between the field and the $\textrm{Fe(Se,Te)}$ film. The scaling procedure based on the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau approach is successfully applied to the observed angular dependence of the critical voltage $V^*$. Anyway, we find out that $\textrm{Fe(Se,Te)}$ represents the case study of a layered material characterized by a weak anisotropy of its static superconducting properties, but with an increased anisotropy in its vortex dynamics due to the predominant perpendicular component of the external applied magnetic field. Indeed, $I^*$ shows less sensitivity to angle variations, thus being promising for high field applications.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe(Se,Te) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Critical current anisotropy in Nd-1111 single crystals and the infuence of neutron irradiation
similarity 0.89M. Eisterer et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.3476
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pinning properties of FeSeTe thin film through multifrequency measurements of the surface impedance
similarity 0.89Nicola Pompeo et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.08186
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-vortex fluctuations in layered superconductors: Electromagnetic coupling and crossover to strong pinning
similarity 0.89Jan Kierfeld
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropy of strong pinning in multi-band superconductors
similarity 0.88Cornelis Jacominus van der Beek et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.1741
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux pinning in PrFeAsO0.9 and NdFeAsO0.9F0.1 superconducting crystals
similarity 0.88C. J. van der Beek et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropy of the magnetic properties of the FeTe0.65Se0.35 superconductor
similarity 0.88S. I. Bondarenko et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.02027
Source status unknown — claims are unverified