Noise-tolerant quantum speedups in quantum annealing without fine tuning
Eliot Kapit, Vadim Oganesyan
arXiv:1710.11056 · 2017-10-30
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum annealing is a powerful alternative model for quantum computing, which can succeed in the presence of environmental noise even without error correction. However, despite great effort, no conclusive proof of a quantum speedup (relative to state of the art classical algorithms) has been shown for these systems, and rigorous theoretical proofs of a quantum advantage generally rely on exponential precision in at least some aspects of the system, an unphysical resource guaranteed to be scrambled by random noise. In this work, we propose a new variant of quantum annealing, called RFQA, which can maintain a scalable quantum speedup in the face of noise and modest control precision. Specifically, we consider a modification of flux qubit-based quantum annealing which includes random, but coherent, low-frequency oscillations in the directions of the transverse field terms as the system evolves. We show that this method produces a quantum speedup for finding ground states in the Grover problem and quantum random energy model, and thus should be widely applicable to other hard optimization problems which can be formulated as quantum spin glasses. Further, we show that this speedup should be resilient to two realistic noise channels ($1/f$-like local potential fluctuations and local heating from interaction with a finite temperature bath), and that another noise channel, bath-assisted quantum phase transitions, actually accelerates the algorithm and may outweigh the negative effects of the others. The modifications we consider have a straightforward experimental implementation and could be explored with current technology.
Similar papers
Prospects for Quantum Enhancement with Diabatic Quantum Annealing
similarity 0.86E. J. Crosson & D. A. Lidar · 2020 · arXiv:2008.09913
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fault-tolerant quantum computation against biased noise
similarity 0.85Panos Aliferis & John Preskill · 2007 · arXiv:0710.1301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Protected Qubits and Chern Simons theories in Josephson Junction Arrays
similarity 0.85B. Doucot et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403712
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fault-Tolerant Computing With Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.85Panos Aliferis et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.0383
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-fidelity quantum operations on superconducting qubits in the presence of noise
similarity 0.84Andrew J. Kerman & William D. Oliver · 2008 · arXiv:0801.0761
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weakly Flux-Tunable Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.84José M. Chávez-Garcia et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified