Spin-flip reflection at the normal metal-spin superconductor interface
Peng Lv, Ai-Min Guo, Huaiyu Li, Chunxiao Liu, X. C. Xie, Qing-Feng Sun
arXiv:1711.06419 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.104516 · 2017-11-17 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study spin transport through a normal metal-spin superconductor junction. A spin-flip reflection is demonstrated at the interface, where a spin-up electron incident from the normal metal can be reflected as a spin-down electron and the spin $2\times \hbar/2$ will be injected into the spin superconductor. When the (spin) voltage is smaller than the gap of the spin superconductor, the spin-flip reflection determines the transport properties of the junction. We consider both graphene-based (linear-dispersion-relation) and quadratic-dispersion-relation normal metal-spin superconductor junctions in detail. For the two-dimensional graphene-based junction, the spin-flip reflected electron can be along the specular direction (retro-direction) when the incident and reflected electron locates in the same band (different bands). A perfect spin-flip reflection can occur when the incident electron is normal to the interface, and the reflection coefficient is slightly suppressed for the oblique incident case. As a comparison, for the one-dimensional quadratic-dispersion-relation junction, the spin-flip reflection coefficient can reach 1 at certain incident energies. In addition, both the charge current and the spin current under a charge (spin) voltage are studied. The spin conductance is proportional to the spin-flip reflection coefficient when the spin voltage is less than the gap of the spin superconductor. These results will help us get a better understanding of spin transport through the normal metal-spin superconductor junction.
Similar papers
Spin-flip reflection at the normal metal-spin superconductor interface
similarity 0.94Peng Lv et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ginzburg-Landau-type theory of non-polarized spin superconductivity
similarity 0.90Peng Lv et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1711.06416
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of crossed Andreev reflection in a superconducting ladder connected to normal metal leads
similarity 0.90Abhiram Soori & Subroto Mukerjee · 2016 · arXiv:1603.00363
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin flip scattering engendered quantum spin torque in a Josephson junction
similarity 0.90Subhajit Pal & Colin Benjamin · 2018 · arXiv:1803.10105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double Andreev reflections and double normal reflections in nodal-line semimetal-superconductor junctions
similarity 0.89Qiang Cheng et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.04499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interfacial Spin-Orbit Coupling: New Platform for Superconducting Spintronics
similarity 0.89Isidoro Martínez et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.08090
Source status unknown — claims are unverified