Driving forbidden transitions in the fluxonium artificial atom
U. Vool, A. Kou, W. C. Smith, N. E. Frattini, K. Serniak, P. Reinhold, I. M. Pop, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. H. Devoret
arXiv:1711.07508 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.054046 · 2017-11-20 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Atomic systems display a rich variety of quantum dynamics due to the different possible symmetries obeyed by the atoms. These symmetries result in selection rules that have been essential for the quantum control of atomic systems. Superconducting artificial atoms are mainly governed by parity symmetry. Its corresponding selection rule limits the types of quantum systems that can be built using electromagnetic circuits at their optimal coherence operation points ("sweet spots"). Here, we use third-order nonlinear coupling between the artificial atom and its readout resonator to drive transitions forbidden by the parity selection rule for linear coupling to microwave radiation. A Lambda-type system emerges from these newly accessible transitions, implemented here in the fluxonium artificial atom coupled to its "antenna" resonator. We demonstrate coherent manipulation of the fluxonium artificial atom at its sweet spot by stimulated Raman transitions. This type of transition enables the creation of new quantum operations, such as the control and readout of physically protected artificial atoms.
Similar papers
Optimizing the nonlinearity and dissipation of a SNAIL Parametric Amplifier for dynamic range
similarity 0.89N. E. Frattini et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.06093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The superconducting circuit companion -- an introduction with worked examples
similarity 0.89S. E. Rasmussen et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.01225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
3-Wave Mixing Josephson Dipole Element
similarity 0.89N. E. Frattini et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.00869
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling flux-quantizing Josephson junction circuits in Keysight ADS
similarity 0.88Ofer Naaman et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.07861
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling and Harmonic Balance Analysis of Parametric Amplifiers for Qubit Read-out
similarity 0.88Daryoush Shiri et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.05177
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of the photon-blockade breakdown phase transition
similarity 0.87Fink, J. M. et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1607.04892
Source status unknown — claims are unverified