Revisiting $^{63}$Cu NMR evidence for charge order in superconducting La$_{1.885}$Sr$_{0.115}$CuO$_4$
T. Imai, S. K. Takahashi, A. Arsenault, A. W. Acton, D. Lee, W. He, Y. S. Lee, M. Fujita
arXiv:1712.07777 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224508 · 2017-12-21 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The presence of charge and spin stripe order in the La2CuO4-based family of superconductors continues to lead to new insight on the unusual ground state properties of high Tc cuprates. Soon after the discovery of charge stripe order at T(charge)=65K in Nd3+ co-doped LSCO ($T_{c}\simeq6$~K) [Tranquada et al., Nature {\bf 375} (1995) 561], Hunt et al. demonstrated that La$_{1.48}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_{0.12}$CuO$_4$ and superconducting LSCO with x~1/8 (Tc ~ 30K) share nearly identical NMR anomalies near $T_{charge}$ of the former [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82} (1999) 4300]. Their inevitable conclusion that LSCO also undergoes charge order at a comparable temperature became controversial, because diffraction measurements at the time were unable to detect Bragg peaks associated with charge order. Recent advances in x-ray diffraction techniques finally led to definitive confirmations of the charge order Bragg peaks in LSCO with an onset at as high as T(charge)=80K. Meanwhile, improved instrumental technology has enabled routine NMR measurements that were not feasible two decades ago. Motivated by these new developments, we revisit the charge order transition of a LSCO single crystal based on 63Cu NMR techniques. We demonstrate that 63Cu NMR properties of the nuclear spin $I_{z}$ = -1/2 to +1/2 central transition below T(charge) exhibit unprecedentedly strong dependence on the measurement time scale set by the NMR pulse separation time $τ$; a new kind of anomalous, very broad wing-like 63Cu NMR signals gradually emerge below T(charge) only for extremely short $τ\lesssim 4~μ$s, while the spectral weight of the normal NMR signals is progressively wiped out. The NMR linewidth and relaxation rates depend strongly on $τ$ below T(charge), and their enhancement in the charge ordered state indicates that charge order turns on strong but inhomogeneous growth of Cu spin-spin correlations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.48Nd0.4Sr0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.885Sr0.115CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.885Sr0.115CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Revisiting Cu63 NMR evidence for charge order in superconducting La1.885Sr0.115CuO4
similarity 0.92T. Imai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning competing orders in La2−xSrxCuO4 cuprate superconductors by the application of an external magnetic field
similarity 0.91J. Chang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
O NMR study of charge ordered LaSrCuO
similarity 0.91T. Imai & K. Hirota · 2017 · arXiv:1712.09380
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
La NMR investigation of the interplay between the lattice, charge, and spin dynamics in charge ordered high cuprate LaBaCuO
similarity 0.91P. M. Singer et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.04265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
La and Cu NMR investigation of charge order in LaCuO (K)
similarity 0.91T. Imai & Y. S. Lee · 2017 · arXiv:1712.09720
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cu nuclear magnetic resonance study of charge and spin stripe order in LaBaCuO
similarity 0.91Pelc, Damjan et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1609.02162
Source status unknown — claims are unverified