Lattice Dynamics of Ultrathin FeSe Films on SrTiO3
Shuyuan Zhang, Jiaqi Guan, Yan Wang, Tom Berlijn, Steve Johnston, Xun Jia, Bing Liu, Qing Zhu, Qichang An, Siwei Xue, Yanwei Cao, Fang Yang, Weihua Wang, Jiandi Zhang, E. W. Plummer, Xuetao Zhu, Jiandong Guo
arXiv:1801.01644 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035408 · 2018-01-05 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Charge transfer and electron-phonon coupling (EPC) are proposed to be two important constituents associated with enhanced superconductivity in the single unit cell FeSe films on oxide surfaces. Using high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy combined with first-principles calculations, we have explored the lattice dynamics of ultrathin FeSe films grown on SrTiO3. We show that, despite the significant effect from the substrate on the electronic structure and superconductivity of the system, the FeSe phonons in the films are unaffected. The energy dispersion and linewidth associated with the Fe- and Se-derived vibrational modes are thickness- and temperature-independent. Theoretical calculations indicate the crucial role of antiferromagnetic correlation in FeSe to reproduce the experimental phonon dispersion. Importantly, the only detectable change due to the growth of FeSe films is the broadening of the Fuchs-Kliewer (F-K) phonons associated with the lattice vibrations of SrTiO$_3$(001) substrate. If EPC plays any role in the enhancement of film superconductivity, it must be the interfacial coupling between the electrons in FeSe film and the F-K phonons from substrate rather than the phonons of FeSe.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 68 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
What Makes the of FeSe/SrTiO so High ?
similarity 0.93Dung-Hai Lee · 2015 · arXiv:1508.02461
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interfacial Superconductivity in FeSe Ultrathin Films on SrTiO3 Probed by In Situ Independently Driven Four-Point-Probe Measurements
similarity 0.93Asger K. Pedersen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
20 K superconductivity in heavily electron doped surface layer of FeSe bulk crystal
similarity 0.93J. J. Seo et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.07950
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in single-layer films of FeSe with a transition temperature above 100 K
similarity 0.93Jian-Feng Ge et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.3435
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal Substrate Effect on the Superconductivity of FeSe Monolayer Films
similarity 0.92Slavko Rebec et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.09358
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intrinsic interfacial van der Waals monolayers and their effect on the high-temperature superconductor FeSe/SrTiO3
similarity 0.92Hunter Sims et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified