← Back to search

Correlation between Superconductivity, Band Filling and Electron Confinement at the LaAlO$_{3}$-SrTiO$_{3}$ Interface

A. E. M. Smink, M. P. Stehno, J. C. de Boer, A. Brinkman, W. G. van der Wiel, H. Hilgenkamp

arXiv:1801.02881 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.245113 · 2018-01-09 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical12 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

By combined top- and backgating, we explore the correlation of superconductivity with band filling and electron confinement at the LaAlO$_3$-SrTiO$_3$ interface. We find that the top- and backgate voltages have distinctly different effects on the superconducting critical temperature, implying that the confining potential well has a profound effect on superconductivity. We investigate the origin of this behavior by comparing the gate-dependence of $T_c$ to the corresponding evolution of the band filling with gate voltage. For several backgate voltages, we observe maximum $T_c$ to consistently coincide with a kink in tuning the band filling for high topgate voltage. Self-consistent Schrödinger-Poisson calculations relate this kink to a Lifshitz transition of the second $d_{xy}$ subband. These results establish a major role for confinement-induced subbands in the phase diagram of SrTiO$_3$ surface states, and establish gating as a means to control the relative energy of these states.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
SrTiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.4Pressure not reportedunknown
SrTiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedmidpoint

Similar papers