The phase diagram of the underdoped cuprates at high magnetic field
Debmalya Chakraborty, Corentin Morice, Catherine Pépin
arXiv:1802.10122 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214501 · 2018-02-27 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The experimentally measured phase diagram of cuprate superconductors in the temperature-applied magnetic field plane illuminates key issues in understanding the physics of these materials. At low temperature, the superconducting state gives way to a long-range charge order with increasing magnetic field; both the orders coexist in a small intermediate region. The charge order transition is strikingly insensitive to temperature, and quickly reaches a transition temperature close to the zero-field superconducting $T_c$. We argue that such a transition along with the presence of the coexisting phase cannot be described simply by a competing orders formalism. We demonstrate that for some range of parameters there is an enlarged symmetry of the strongly coupled charge and superconducting orders in the system depending on their relative masses and the coupling strength of the two orders. We establish that this sharp switch from the superconducting phase to the charge order phase can be understood in the framework of a composite SU(2) order parameter comprising the charge and superconducting orders. Finally, we illustrate that there is a possibility of the coexisting phase of the competing charge and superconducting orders only when the SU(2) symmetry between them is weakly broken due to biquadratic terms in the free energy. The relation of this sharp transition to the proximity to the pseudogap quantum critical doping is also discussed.
Similar papers
Phenomenological description of competing antiferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity in high cuprates
similarity 0.89Bumsoo Kyung & A. M. -S. Tremblay · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gap like structure in a nonsuperconducting layered oxycarbonate BiSrCuCOO single crystal
similarity 0.89S. I. Vedeneev et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.2919
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of the pseudogap on T in the cuprates and implications for its origin
similarity 0.89Vivek Mishra et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.2639
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Defects in correlated metals and superconductors
similarity 0.88H. Alloul et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0711.0877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprates phase diagram deduced from magnetic susceptibility: what is the `true' pseudogap line?
similarity 0.88Yves Noat et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.02589
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On pseudogap phase as precursor to a superconducting dome in high-Tc cuprates: Non-analytic T* as a function of doping
similarity 0.88Felix A. Buot · 2026 · arXiv:2606.11056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified