← Back to search

Hund-enhanced electronic compressibility in FeSe and its correlation with T$_c$

Pablo Villar Arribi, Luca de' Medici

arXiv:1803.01494 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.197001 · 2018-03-05 · Physical review letters

T4experimental17 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We compute the compressibility of the conduction electrons in both bulk orthorhombic FeSe and monolayer FeSe on SrTiO$_3$ substrate, including dynamical electronic correlations within slave-spin mean-field + density-functional theory. Results show a zone of enhancement of the electronic compressibility crossing the interaction-doping phase diagram of these compounds in accord with previous simulations on iron pnictides and in general with the phenomenology of Hund's metals. Interestingly at ambient pressure FeSe is found slightly away from the zone with enhanced compressibility but moved right into it with hydrostatic pressure, while in monolayer FeSe the stronger enhancement region is realized on the electron-doped side. These findings correlate positively with the enhancement of superconductivity seen in experiments, and support the possibility that Hund's induced many-body correlations boost superconductive pairing when the system is at the frontier of the normal- to Hund's-metal crossover.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure unresolvedunknown
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

378 GPaunknown
FeSe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

65Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers